Wednesday, 25 February 2009

Minister Chen on Protectionism in the WSJ

Need a Real Sponsor here

Protectionism Doesn't Pay

China calls on the world's governments to learn from history.

The global financial crisis is no doubt a catalyst for trade protectionism. As the world economy deteriorates, some countries try to boost growth prospects by erecting trade barriers. China calls on these governments not to replay history and revert to protectionism and economic isolationism.

Previous global economic crises were accompanied by frequent trade disputes. The U.S. passage of large-scale tariffs in 1930, for example, triggered a retaliatory global trade war. During the two oil shocks in the 1970s and 1980s, trade frictions emerged when major economies attempted to increase exports by depreciating their currencies. And in the wake of the 1997 Asian financial crisis, there was a notable uptick in antidumping actions, countervailing duties and other protectionist measures.

The financial crisis is now spilling over into the real economy, hitting sectors like manufacturing and services. In almost all countries, factories are closing and unemployment is rising, creating political pressure and social problems. More and more governments are strengthening intervention in their economies under the excuse of "economic security," and protecting vulnerable domestic industries by curbing imports from other countries.

Trade protectionism differs from legally acceptable measures to protect trade. It is an abuse of remedies provided by multilateral trade rules. This kind of protectionism is morphing into more complex and disguised forms, ranging from conventional tariff and nontariff barriers to technical barriers to trade, industry standards and industry protectionism.

With the economic crisis worsening, caution must be taken even in employing trade protection measures consistent with World Trade Organization rules. At the G-20 Financial Summit in November 2008, world leaders called for countries to resist trade protectionism and committed themselves to refraining from new barriers to trade and investment, a message strongly echoed by the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit at the end of last year and the World Economic Forum held in Davos last month.

History tells us that trade protection measures hurt not only other countries, but eventually the country that erected them in the first place. To counter the Great Depression, the U.S. adopted the Smoot-Hawley Act in 1930, which raised import duties of over 20,000 foreign products significantly and provoked protectionist retaliation from other countries. Faced with that crisis, other countries pursued beggar-thy-neighbor policies that slashed global trade volume from $36 billion in 1929 to $12 billion in 1932. Among the victims, not the least was the U.S. itself, where exports shrank from $5.2 billion in 1929 to $1.2 billion in 1932. Even in the U.S., the Smoot-Hawley Act was widely believed to be a catalyst that aggravated the effects of the Great Depression.

Global trade is now in dire straits. Thanks to shrinking external demand caused by the economic crisis, major trading countries have seen their export growth tumble or have suffered huge contractions. Germany's exports dropped 10.6% in November 2008, compared to the same period the prior year -- the highest one-month drop since 1990. China also experienced negative export growth in November, and a 17.5% decline last month, when compared to the prior year. Protectionist policies would make things even worse, and the consequences would be hard to predict.

In the heat of the crisis, it's critical that all countries refrain from pointing fingers at each other or pursuing their own interests at the expense of others. The financial crisis reflects a chronic illness resulting from global economic structural imbalance and financial risk accumulation, and there is no quick fix to this malady. The fundamental interest of every country is to step up consultation and cooperation and keep international trade smoothly flowing. Healthy international trade can help revive the world economy. During the Great Depression, the U.S. recovered from its economic woes because the Roosevelt administration implemented the New Deal and shunned protectionism.

Today's unprecedented financial crisis has inflicted a severe impact on China and other countries. China's economic growth has slowed, exports have plunged, and unemployment pressure has mounted. Yet even so, China still firmly believes that trade protectionism isn't a solution to the world's problems. In 2008, amid a contraction in global trade, China imported $1.133 trillion worth of goods from countries around the world -- an 18.5% increase over the prior year. These imports are boosting the economic development of China's trading partners. Since the crisis broke out, the Chinese government has put forward a series of measures aiming at stimulating domestic demand. Given the size and openness of our country, the growth in China's domestic markets can be translated into greater market potential and investment opportunities for other countries. This year China will continue to increase imports and send buying missions abroad for large-scale purchase of equipment, products and technology.

China has always championed our mutually beneficial opening-up policy and advocated international economic cooperation. We maintain that the Doha Round of global trade negotiations should be taken forward in a way that meets the interests of members and complies with the multilateral trading system already established. China is ready to stand together with all nations in the world to face up to the challenges of today, tackle the financial crisis through cooperation, and guide the world economy into a new period of prosperity.

Mr. Chen is minister of commerce for the People's Republic of China.

Saturday, 21 February 2009

Sino-Philippines dispute (not trade-related)

I know that China has not recognized the jurisdiction of the ICJ and the Philippines, while recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court in general, has excluded the jurisdiction on territorial disputes. However, it is probably still worth exploring the possibility of having the ICJ sort out the dispute, just like Singapore and Malaysia in the recent Pedra Branca case.

Solemn declaration of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China concerning the Philippine Senate Bill 2699 and House Bill 3216

No. 001 February 6, 2009

The Philippine Senate and House of Representatives passed Senate Bill 2699 on January 28 and House Bill 3216 on February 2 respectively, incorporating Huangyan Dao(or the Scarborough Shoal for the Philippines), in Macclesfield Bank, and part of the Spratly Islands into Philippine territory. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China solemnly declares as follows:
1.In terms of either history, geography, reality or international law, the Spratly Islands, Paracel Islands, Macclesfield Islands, Pratas Islands, as well as the surrounding waters, are the existent territories of the Republic of China. The fact that sovereignty of these areas belongs to our government is undeniable, Taiwan enjoys and deserves all rights accordingly. Any sovereignty claims over, or occupation of, these islands and their surrounding waters will not be recognized by the government of the Republic of China.
2.The Government of the Republic of China calls on the Philippine government to abide by the principles and spirit of the UN Charter, UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea in order to peacefully solve through dialogue any dispute involving the issue of the South China Sea.(E)


Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China


2009/02/18

On 17 February 2009, the Philippine Congress passed an Act to Define the Archipelagic Baselines of the Philippines (an Act to Amend Certain Provisions of Republic Act No. 3046, As Amended By Republic Act No. 5446, to Define the Archipelagic Baselines of the Philippines, and For Other Purposes). The Act includes Huangyan Island and some islands and reefs of Nansha Islands as Philippine territory. The Government of the People's Republic of China hereby reiterates that Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands have always been a part of China's territory. The People's Republic of China has indisputable sovereignty over these islands and their adjacent waters. Claims to territory sovereignty over Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands by any other country are all illegal and invalid.


China Lodges Stern Protest over Baselines Bill of the Philippines

2009/02/19


On the afternoon of February 18, 2009, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Wang Guangya summoned the Charge d'affaires of the Philippine embassy to China, Maria Barber, to lodge a stern protest over the approval of the 2009 Baselines Bill by the Philippine congress.

"The congress of the Philippines passed the Baselines Bill yesterday, which usurped China's Huangyan Island and some islands of Nansha Islands as Philippine territory," said Wang. "The Chinese government expresses its strong dissatisfaction and stern protest over the adoption of the bill that violated China's sovereignty by the Philippine government, in defiance of the grave concern raised by and repeated protests from the Chinese government," said Wang.

"Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands have always been inalienable parts of the Chinese territory," said Wang, adding that China possesses indisputable sovereignty over the Huangyan Island, the Nansha Islands and adjacent waters. "Territorial sovereignty claims over the Huangyan Island and islands of Nansha Islands by any other country were illegal and invalid," he said.

It is the wish of the Chinese side that the Philippines will take into consideration the bilateral relations, the interests of both peoples and the peace and stability of the South China Sea region, take solid and sufficient measures to stop all the activities that violate China's sovereignty rights, take concrete actions to safeguard the stability of the South China Sea region and ensure the healthy development of bilateral relations, Wang said.

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

MOFCOM on neo-protectionism

It seems that MOFCOM will bring more cases in the WTO. This again proved that bad times can be good times for lawyers.

商务部召开新闻发布会(2月16日)
2009-02-16 20:59  文章来源:商务部新闻办公室
文章类型:原创  内容分类:新闻


 2009年2月16日,商务部召开新闻发布会,新闻发言人姚坚发布新闻并回答记者提问。实录如下:

  姚坚:首先发布商务工作四个方面的情况。

  四、关于中国应对贸易摩擦和反对贸易保护主义情况。

  当前,受国际金融危机深化影响,一些国家出台了形形色色的贸易保护措施。这些贸易保护措施主要分为两类:一是滥用世贸规则允许的贸易救济措施,主要是反倾销、反补贴,保障措施和特殊保障措施,简称"两反两保";二是使用传统的关税和非关税壁垒,如有的国家提高进口关税,采取禁止或者限制进口的措施、实施技术性贸易壁垒等,还有的国家在刺激本国经济方案中提出了优先购买本国产品的条款,我们对此深感忧虑。我们反对任何形式的贸易保护主义,主张通过合作和磋商解决国际贸易中存在的问题。我们认为贸易保护措施将使金融危机下本已严峻的经济形势更加困难,各国不应以邻为壑,而应加强合作和磋商,这才符合各国的根本利益。

  商务部高度重视应对贸易摩擦,主张通过磋商来解决问题,切实维护中国企业的利益。我们密切跟踪贸易保护措施的最新动向,采取有效措施积极应对。这些工作主要包括五个方面:一是要强化对广大企业的服务,支持中国企业运用法律手段积极应诉;二是鼓励商协会与国外业界进行沟通和交流;三是进一步完善贸易摩擦预警监控机制,让企业能在第一时间了解贸易摩擦动向;四是加强政府间的双边对话和沟通。目前商务部已经与美国、欧盟、南非、韩国、澳大利亚等 11个国家和地区建立双边贸易救济合作机制,积极开展对话与磋商;五是充分利用世贸组织争端解决机制维护国家利益等。

  通过各方共同努力,近期我国在有效应对贸易摩擦方面,取得了一些列较好的结果。包括最近成功应对欧盟对于中国出口的镀锌板反倾销调查。这是欧盟最大的一起对华反倾销调查,案件的妥善解决有利于我钢铁产品对欧稳定出口,直接关系到10万人的就业。2008年,我们通过磋商和交涉妥善处理了11起贸易争端,为国内的企业赢得了更好的出口市场和更平稳的发展环境。

  最近,在G7财长会议、G20金融峰会、达沃斯论坛等不同场合,各方一再呼吁反对和遏制贸易保护主义。特别是在当前国际金融危机加深的环境下,各国应该更加警惕,防止贸易保护主义措施的滥用。我们也注意到世贸组织从2009年开始加强了对各国"救市"措施的监督和审议,2月9号发表了《经济金融危机及贸易发展相关问题的报告》,审议了2008年9月以来各成员为应对金融危机所采取的新的贸易措施。中方支持WTO采取行动,抑制贸易保护主义泛滥,加强对各国"救市"措施的监督。我们认为WTO及时跟踪各国贸易政策的走向和具体措施,监督成员切实履行承诺,是抵制贸易保护主义抬头,敦促各成员继续奉行贸易开放战略的有效机制和手段。中方支持这一举措,将积极参与相关的贸易政策审议工作。

  中国坚持互利共赢的开放战略,倡导国际经济合作、推进贸易投资便利化。金融危机爆发以来,中国政府积极应对,果断出台一系列扩大内需、保持经济稳定增长的措施。作为一个开放的大国,中国将为其他国家提供更大的市场空间和更多的投资机会。

Why do you need to know something about international law and international orgnizations

The latest reason: to fend off the scam artists. In addition to the
numerous spelling and grammatical errors, the following scam has
another tell-tale sign: the UNDP was not created until in 1965. Indeed
anyone with some knowledge about the history of the UN should tell
this: as any other specialized agencies of the UN, the earliest date
the UNDP could have been established would be 1945, when the UN itself
came into existence. Now a trivia question: Is the WTO also an UN
specialized agency?

I won't be surprised that pretty soon I will receive another email
telling me that I have won something from the "Technical Assistance
Fund that was created in 1935 by the WTO, the IMF and World Bank". Now
Mr. Scam Artist, don't forget to send me my cut of the cash (no check
please) if you ever decide to adopt that idea.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lanyon, Richard <Richard.Lanyon@mwrd.org>
Date: Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Subject: AWARD PRIZE
To:

UNITED NATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Corporate Headquarters,91 Station Road,
West Drayton United Kingdom.


The UNITED NATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM would like to notify you that
you have been chosen by the board of DEVELOPMENT BOARD as the full
recipient of a cash Grant/Donation for your own personal,
educational,Working and business development TO receive the sum of
1,000,000.00 ONE MILLION POUNDS

The UNITED NATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, established 1877 by the
Multi-Million groups and now supported by the FBI,Economic Community
for West African State(ECOWAS)and the European Union (EU). Based on
the random selection exercise of internet websites and millions of
supermarket cash invoices worldwide, you were selected among the
recipients to receive the award sum of 1,000,000.00 GBP (One Million
British pounds starlings) as charity donations/aid from the UNITED
NATION ORGANIZATION ,ECOWAS and EU EUROPIAN UNION in accordance with
the enabling act of Parliament, All beneficiaries email addresses were
selected randomly from over 100,000 internet websites around the
World.

You are required to contact our company representative whom will be in
charge of your claim with the below information:

FULL NAMES :
ADDRESS :
COUNTRY :
SEX :
AGE :
OCCUPATION :
E-MAIL ADDRESS :
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
Send all the requested claim information to your allocated claim officer:

Mr. Dan Cole
Email: unverifications@live.com
Tell Number: +447035901229
Claims Processing Agent,
Verifications/Logistic Department.

NOTE: you will be given your secret code number,which you will use in
collecting your ONE MILLION POUNDS, endeavor to quote your
Qualification numbers (NG-022-607AB) in all discussions. All
information is strictly confidential and will only be used for the
purpose to which it is been requested

On behalf of the Board kindly,accept our warmest congratulations.

Warm Regards.
Lanyonr Miccaglla
(Online Announcer UNDP).

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Special Textile Safeguard Expired

While the Special Textile Safeguard against China has expired as of
Dec 31st 2008, China may still be subject to the Transitional
Product-Specific Safeguard Mechanism, which will only expire in late
2013.

商务部外贸司负责人就2009年纺织品问题答记者问
2009-01-23 09:01 文章来源:商务部新闻办公室
文章类型:原创 内容分类:其它
  根据中美、中欧纺织品备忘录,自2009年1月1日起,我国不再对输
美、输欧纺织品实行纺织品出口许可证管理。近一段时间以来,广大纺织出口企业对取消许可证管理后的出口政策和宏观环境十分关心,为此,商务部外贸司负责人
专门就2009年纺织品出口有关问题接受了记者采访。

  问:您能否先简要介绍一下当前中国纺织业的整体情况?

  答:纺织业是中国重要的劳动密集型产业,直接从业人员2000多万,间接涉及上亿人口就业。纺织品问题一直是中国政府和业界的重要关注。

  当前,受人民币升值、生产要素成本上升、流动资金紧张等多种不利因素影响,中国纺织企业的生产经营出现较大困难。特别是进入2008年第三季
度,国际金融危机的蔓延已显现出对我实体经济的负面影响。中国纺织业遭遇内需减缓、外需下降的双重压力。一是固定资产投资减少,2008年前十个月,纺织
行业固定资产新开工项目同比下降7.7%。二是订单下降,如在第104届广交会上,纺织品成交额比上届下降了31.5%。三是企业效益明显下滑,行业内停
产倒闭企业增加,全国规模以上纺织企业就业出现了负增长的局面,中小企业减员情况严重。

  问:在当前情况下,您对今年我国纺织品出口形势有何判断?

  答:2008年以来,中国纺织品出口增速出现下滑。根据中国海关统计,2008年我纺织品服装累计出口1851.7亿美元,同比增长
8.2%,增幅较2007年下降10.7个百分点。从当前经济发展形势看,受劳动力成本上升、人民币升值、主要进口市场消费需求减弱等因素影响,预计
2009年中国纺织品整体出口增速将继续放缓。

  同时,经过2005年一体化后的过渡,有关产品出口潜能已得到充分释放,我们认为,中国与有关国家双边纺织品协议产品不会出现"激增",更不
会对其他出口方造成威胁。近几年国际纺织品贸易稳定发展,充分证明了这一点。我们有理由相信,中国纺织业与主要贸易伙伴的纺织业界在发展过程中可以优势互
补、相互依存,2008年后的双边纺织品贸易将会平稳、健康发展。

  问:刚才您提到了双边纺织品协议问题。您能谈谈协议到期后我国纺织品出口面临的宏观环境以及商务部有关纺织品出口管理政策吗?

  答:2005年全球纺织品一体化后,中国政府从大局出发,就纺织品问题分别与欧盟、美国等达成协议,为双方企业创造了稳定和可预见的
贸易环境,也为有关国家进行纺织产业调整创造了条件。2008年底,上述双边纺织品协议均如期终止。自2009年1月1日起,我国不再实行输美纺织品出口
数量及许可证管理和输欧纺织品出口许可证管理,亦不实行企业经营资质审核。

  当前,国际金融市场急剧动荡,世界经济增长明显放缓,国际经济环境中不稳定因素明显增多,我纺织品出口面临着一些新情况、新问题。个别国家业
界以担心中国纺织品在2008年后会出现"激增"为由,要求其政府与中方续签协议或对中国纺织品采取贸易救济措施。我们注意到,2008年20国集团金融
峰会发表宣言明确提出"在金融不稳定时期,更应力戒保护主义,力戒对投资或商品和服务贸易设置新壁垒"。2008年11月22日,APEC领导人也就全球
经济发表声明,反对各种形式的保护主义。我们认为,2008年后的纺织品贸易应遵循自由贸易原则,进口国不应再人为设置贸易障碍。

  问:在取消出口许可证管理后,您认为应该如何稳定纺织品贸易环境?

  答:正如我前面提到的,目前国际经济环境中不稳定因素增多,我纺织品出口面临着许多新情况、新问题。我们要认真贯彻落实中央经济工作
会议精神,努力保持出口的稳定增长,同时要警惕国际贸易保护主义抬头,未雨绸缪,加强行业协调自律,有序出口,避免因个别产品出口数量过快增长引发有关进
口国业界对我提起贸易救济诉讼,影响我贸易环境的稳定。

  在当前形势下,为贯彻落实科学发展观,保持纺织品等劳动密集型产品出口的稳定增长,商务部已搭建了纺织品出口预警平台,在官方网站定期公布敏
感纺织品出口数据,为企业出口做好预警监测。广大出口企业可以登录商务部网站,查询有关信息。对外,我们将进一步加强与有关国家的对话与沟通,确保平稳过
渡,为我纺织品出口创造良好的外部环境。希望各级商务主管部门要继续做好服务工作,引导企业转变增长方式,调整产品结构;有关行业商协会要充分发挥桥梁和
纽带作用,积极开展自律互律等行业协调工作,主动维持出口秩序,维护我纺织品出口的稳定、可持续发展;广大纺织品出口企业要积极转变观念,尽快适应新形
势,有序安排2009年的出口计划,避免盲目扩张产能,着力提高产品的质量和附加值,争创品牌出口产品,增强我纺织品的国际竞争力和抗风险能力。

  问:针对您刚才提到的纺织品领域的贸易摩擦,您认为,纺织业界能做哪些工作呢?

  答:中国政府鼓励中国纺织业界与相关国家产业进行合作,推动业界就促进双边纺织品贸易进行对话。在当前形势下,希望双方业界能进一步
拓展合作渠道,丰富合作内容,为双方产业实现长远合作共赢创造良好的条件。自2007年起,中国政府在中国最大的交易会--广交会上专门设立了进口展区,
并已经产生了积极的效果。我们欢迎有关国家纺织业界组团参加中国广交会进口展,寻找更多的贸易和合作机会。

  问:对于扩大中国与有关国家纺织业合作方面,您有什么看法?

  答:近年来,随着中国经济的不断发展,国民经济相关产业及国内纺织品服装消费市场的需求在拉动中国纺织业发展的同时,也为世界范围内
的棉花、家纺、服装产品以及先进的纺织机械提供巨大的市场和广阔发展空间。特别是在中国政府采取了一系列扩大进口措施以来,中国的纺织品市场日趋开放,并
蕴藏无限商机。

  首先,中国降低进口关税为各贸易伙伴扩大对华出口创造条件。2008年我国进口平均关税已降至9.8%,自2008年6月1日起,我国又进一
步调低了棉花的进口关税。显而易见,中国这个全球第一大纺织品生产国和拥有13亿人口的纺织品消费国为世界各国和各地区纺织企业扩大对华出口提供了更多机
遇。

  其次,中国国内纺织业发展带动棉花、羊毛、化纤原料、纺织纱线的进口。根据中国海关统计,2008年中国进口棉花34.9亿美元,进口羊毛17.0亿美元,进口纺织用合成纤维7.5亿美元,进口合成纤维纱线15.7亿美元。

  最后,中国内需增长为进口服装提供广阔市场。随着中国国民消费能力的提高和服装消费市场的扩大,中国民众对进口服装的需求不断增长。2007年和2008年1-11月,中国进口服装分别为19.7亿美元和20.9亿美元,同比分别增长14.7%和16.6%。

  问:最近,国外媒体对中国上调纺织品服装出口退税率十分关心,部分媒体甚至认为这是中国对纺织业进行的补贴。您是如何看待这一问题的?

  答:中华人民共和国财政部和国家税务总局于2008年7月31日联合发文,将部分纺织品和服装的出口退税率从11%上调至13%。10月21日,又将出口退税率进一步上调至14%,自11月1日起执行。

  出口退税是对出口货物在国内生产和流转环节征收的增值税和消费税予以抵扣或退还。出口退税符合WTO规则,也是国际惯例。2008年以来,为保持经济平稳较快增长,中国两次提高纺织品服装出口退税率,目前退税率为14%,征退税差为3个百分点。

“Buy China”, the Chinese Wal-Mart and Cut Throat Price Wars

Vice Minister Jiang Zengwei of China's MOFCOM made some interesting remarks at a press conference yesterday:

First, will China adopt a "Buy China" policy following the example of the "Buy America" provision in the US stimulus package? No.

Second, China should try to build some giant national retailers following the model of Wal-Mart.

Third, there should be no "inappropriate promotional tactics" that might push SMEs out of business.

In summary, the future might look like this: there will be some big home-grown retailers (a good name would be Wo-Mai, which means "I sell" in Chinese. If anyone decides to adopt this name in the future, please don't forget to pay me royalties), and they will buy products from all over the world. While they could engage in price wars that cut the throats of foreigners wide open in other countries, no such tactics could be employed in China (as this would obviously be against the national policy to "build a harmonious society").

Interested readers can get more details from the Chinese and English news stories below.

商务部副部长姜增伟就消费热点话题答记者问
2009-02-10 10:02  文章来源:《 人民日报 》( 2009年2月10日 08 版)
文章类型:原创  内容分类:新闻


  2月9日,国务院新闻办在京举办新闻发布会,邀请商务部副部长姜增伟等介绍我国搞活流通、扩大消费有关情况,并就热点话题回答了中外记者提问。

  姜增伟说,经济发展的动力在于最终消费需求。当前国际金融危机尚未见底,经济增长放缓使城乡居民收入增长受到影响,消费心理产生波动,一些消费热点也发生变化。但促进消费的有利因素很多,中央启动内需政策措施的良效正逐步显现,商务部对搞活流通、扩大消费仍充满信心。

  发放消费券是可行的选择

  关于发放消费券问题,姜增伟说,在特殊条件下采取特殊办法,是一个较可行的选择。成都、杭州发放了一些消费券,对拉动消费起到了推进作用。作为尝试或一种临时办法,增加低收入人群收入应作为扩大消费的主要举措,同时也要保证建立覆盖面宽的社保体系。在地方发放消费券的同时,今年初我国为 7400万低收入者发放了一次性补贴,每人100―150元。中国政府两大举措将对消费发挥积极作用,一是医改,一是教改,如果这两项重要措施出台,对中国的市场消费特别是农村消费将产生显效。

  对国内国外商品一视同仁

  对于美国的"购买美国货"一事,姜增伟表示,在经济全球化的前提下,一个国家满足自己的市场,仅仅限于本国的生产是做不到的。中国商品市场 80%以上还主要基于国内生产,但相当一部分商品是需要从国际市场补充或购买的。包括工业原料品、奢侈品、农产品,我们一年要从美国、加拿大、澳大利亚进口小麦、大豆,来弥补国内缺口。每个国家必须要大力发展国际贸易,实现商品大流通,才能发挥各自国家经济的特点,才能满足消费者需求。国家的商品竞争力表现在质量和价格。中国不会实行"购买中国货"政策,只要有需求,不管是国内的商品、国外的商品,我们都一视同仁。

  培育本土流通巨头不是抑制竞争

  商务部提出培育若干家大型流通企业集团,有人担心这会形成行业垄断、抑制市场竞争。对此,姜增伟回应,这是流通企业在市场经济条件下的再构。中国流通企业99%以上是中小企业,这些中小企业占全国中小企业70%。商贸流通企业现有职工8000万,规模小、经营集中度低、效率不高,竞争力无从谈起,不能较好满足社会化大生产或以需求为主导的消费增长方式需要。企业需要规模效应,需要在此基础上增强抗风险能力和竞争力。世界零售巨头沃尔玛2008 年销售额达到3787亿美元,折合人民币2.5万亿,占我国社会消费品零售总额的23.9%。中国目前最大的家电连锁企业是国美,2008年销售额是 1023亿元。我们跟全球大百货企业、大零售企业的差距不是一两年能赶上的,任重而道远。中国必须要有类似于沃尔玛这样的企业,一旦发生自然灾害和突发事件,可将企业自身的商品周转和储备结合起来,迅速做出市场反应。同时,大企业承担社会责任的意识更强。我国流通企业做强做大,主要靠企业通过市场竞争实现,必须坚持市场化取向,政府的支持,主要体现在解决企业发展中的一些政策障碍,比如消除地区封锁,推动流通企业跨区域兼并重组,为企业创造良好竞争环境等方面。

  家政服务将成扩消费新亮点

  姜增伟说,目前大部分家政服务企业规模小,内容单一,员工培训和技能达不到市场的要求和标准。由于管理问题,消费者和用工者之间的纠纷不断发生。现在的家政服务需求还难以满足,消费者不敢接受服务;企业不知道谁需要服务、需要什么样的服务。商务部将推动建立覆盖全社会的家政服务网络中心,提供相关服务信息,并对现有的家政服务企业制定标准和规范,使服务内容、方式、价格、质量都符合当前经济社会发展的水平。形成服务特色,满足不同群体多样化需求,使这类企业成为广大居民信得过、用得好的生活帮手。

  提供家政服务的群体大部分是农民工和"4050"下岗职工,他们的服务热情客观存在,但必须对其加大培训力度,要有统一标准,解决放心消费的问题。这个工作做好了,能有效扩大就业。比如月嫂,现在很多年轻姑娘结婚后都需要月嫂服务,有需求,有服务,又能解决就业,收入也很高,可见家政服务市场前景非常好。

  今明年"农家店"将提供77万多个岗位

  对于"万村千乡市场工程",姜增伟说,一个"农家店"目前安排就业是3.1至3.2人,今年商务部要在已建立26万家的基础上再建15万家" 农家店",在一定程度上有利于增加农民工就业岗位,这还不包括配送中心及其他服务网络,比如农资配套、邮政服务配套等。按计划,到2010年底将建成51 万家"农家店",就目前看,今、明年"农家店"将提供约77.5万个岗位。"万村千乡"受到了农民欢迎,方便了农民消费,尤其是确保了商品质量安全,成为我国农村商品流通体系不可替代的部分。

  重点查处各类促销违法行为

  春节以来,有些商家的促销在一定程度上出现增加消费成本、虚假促销的行为。姜增伟说,商家搞促销是常用手段,在各种促销活动包括打折销售中,我们一定首先要平衡厂家、消费者和商家三者的利益。任何一方伤害他人利益,只顾自身财富扩展和获利的行为,是不对的,且要受相关规定和条例处罚。另外,如果采取不适当的促销行为,挤垮中小企业,或给中小企业带来更多困难,也是不应该的。查处各类促销活动违法行为将是今年扩大消费工作一个重点。

  商品市场价格不会有大的波动

  关于今年国内商品市场价格走势,姜增伟认为,结合"两个市场"看,上半年不会出现大的波动,包括生产资料市场和消费品市场。从1月份生活必需品市场看,粮价基本保持稳定,食用油价格小幅下跌,肉价比去年12月份有所上涨,菜价因为受季节性和节日因素影响,比去年12月份上升了30%。生产资料价格总水平比去年12月份下降1.3%,跌幅比12月份缩小0.5个百分点。随着国际金融危机的影响不断扩展到实体经济,全球经济衰退迹象已非常明显,在这种情况下,原油、铁矿石等产品价格也大幅下降。在此前提下,国家出台的一系列扩大内需措施对于稳定市场价格起到积极作用,也为我们实现全年8%左右的经济增长提供了条件。

Strait Times
Beijing won't have 'Buy China' clause
By Sim Chi Yin, China Correspondent
Feb 10, 2009

BEIJING: - China will not impose a protectionist 'Buy China' clause in its economic stimulus package, a top Chinese official said yesterday, urging all countries to encourage international trade in the current crunch.

Without mentioning the 'Buy America' provision in the United States' stimulus package, Vice- Commerce Minister Jiang Zengwei said China would be even-handed towards foreign and domestic products - implying that Beijing's own four trillion yuan (S$873 billion) programme to pump-prime its economy will not discriminate against foreign businesses as some had feared.

Global demand for China's exports, which provide almost 40 per cent of its gross domestic product, has already collapsed in recent months and would take a further hit if international trade barriers go up.
Answering a question at a press conference, he said: 'We just need to boost consumption, whether it's through domestically made goods or foreign-made goods. Why should one be protectionist under the current circumstances?

'As long as there's demand, we'll treat domestic and foreign products the same way.'

In the US, some lawmakers want to include a 'Buy American' provision in the US$827 billion (S$1.24 trillion) stimulus package before Congress, to support homegrown companies and workers. The Senate last week voted to soften - but not junk - that clause, after President Barack Obama cautioned that the original wording could spark a trade war.

The US has reciprocal obligations under the North American Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organisation to provide trading partners such as Canada, Mexico, Japan and the European Union with access to its government procurement market.

But other countries, including China and India, are not party to those pacts and thus will not be spared.

China's Commerce Ministry yesterday said it was 'seriously concerned' at Indian barriers to its exports. India imposed a six-month ban on imports of Chinese toys last month.

Global demand for China's exports, which provide almost 40 per cent of its gross domestic product, has already collapsed in recent months and would take a further hit if international trade barriers go up.

As Mr Jiang made plain: 'Even in the age of globalisation, no one country can satisfy its own markets from its own production.'

China makes 80 per cent of the goods sold domestically, he noted, but it still needs to import products ranging from raw materials to agricultural goods and luxury items.

Beijing unveiled its massive stimulus plan in November last year to spur domestic demand and drive growth, homing in on investments in transport infrastructure, the power grid and post-earthquake reconstruction, as well as rural development.

Some foreign companies had been worried that Beijing might give local businesses preferential treatment. Mr Jiang's comments yesterday would go some way to assuaging those fears.

On its part, Beijing is keeping its eye on pumping up domestic consumption to help the Chinese economy recover from a sharper- than-expected dip as it feels the full weight of the global financial meltdown.

Despite concerns that mass unemployment among migrant workers and the current drought - the worst in decades - would dampen the spending power of the 750 million rural Chinese, things are looking up, said Mr Jiang.

He noted that retail sales went up 13.8 per cent during the 'golden week' Chinese New Year holiday, exceeding forecast.

He also put his stamp of approval on a scheme by municipal governments to hand out vouchers for residents to buy consumer goods - but did not commit to implementing it nationwide.

While Beijing reportedly stepped in to halt some local governments' measures to jump- start the slumped property market, Mr Jiang termed the voucher scheme 'practical', saying that 'special circumstances call for special measures'.

No data has been collated, but the governments of the eastern city of Hangzhou and south-western Chengdu saw retail sales go up after giving out coupons worth 100 yuan to 200 yuan for low-income families to use in local stores and supermarkets over the Chinese New Year break, the official Xinhua news agency reported.

simcy@sph.com.sg

Monday, 26 January 2009

Is China Manipulating its Currency, or is the US Manipulating its Culture?

Gietner's accusation that China is a currency manipulator and China's rebuttal that this is just another protectionist rhetoric from the US revived the debate as to whether China has violated international rules by undervaluing its currency. What are the real reasons to the swelling American national debt and who should bear the blame? We've heard of many theories and now Alireza Gharagozlou, a lawyer currently pursuing advanced studies at NYU, offers another interesting explanation - culture - in his new article linked below. Fellow blog readers are most welcome to comment on his paper by posting comments either on this blog or directly to him.

When Did Scrooge Become a Role Model? Why Criticism of America's National Debt is Misplaced

Alireza Gharagozlou

Abstract: As the world debates the economic crisis, it does so without considering two historically important ideas: the stigmatization of miserliness and the prohibition of usury. Although these ideas were once keystones of society, they are missing from the current discourse. This paper seeks to reintroduce those ideas. It starts by exploring the reason why cheapness was stigmatized, and why usury was illegal for hundreds of years. The paper then applies this historic lens to a frequently debated topic - the national debt and China-U.S. economic relations.


Wednesday, 21 January 2009

Who said Obama is not pro-trade?

From Barack Obama's inaugural address:

"To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to
make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved
bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that
enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to
suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world's
resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we
must change with it."

Does this mean that the US is willing to get rid of its high
agricultural subsidies, which has been a main obstacle to the DDA?

China fastened its trade remedy machine

The MOFCOM recently launched an anti-dumping investigation against
steel and iron fasteners from the EU. This is the first
counter-investigation taken against a foreign investigation. It would
be interesting to see how the case plays out.

保卫紧固件产业还应善用WTO规则
2009-01-20 15:56:04.0 中国工业报


"欧盟已经获得我国立案的信息,欧洲工业紧固件协会也将开会讨论该案的应对情况。"1月12日,曾多次组织企业到欧盟进行抗辩游说的浙江省嘉兴市紧固件进出口企业协会副秘书长张峰对中国工业报记者透露。此时距离中国商务部对原产于欧盟的进口碳钢紧固件发起反倾销立案调查已近半月。而利害关系方向商务部进出口公平贸易局和损害调查局申请或登记应诉的20天时限,也所剩不多。
  "截至日期过后,我们会将登记信息进行汇总整理然后公告。现在还不能透露任何情况。"商务部损害调查局相关人员15日对本报记者表示。
  "这是我国首次利用WTO规则对国外的贸易救济措施进行反制裁的一个案件。我们协会及会员企业坚决支持对欧紧固件产品发起反倾销调查。"张峰表示,我国加入WTO这么多年了,希望政府能积极灵活地运用其规则来保护自己的利益。
  这场博弈,是否将成为我国紧固件行业的"斯大林格勒保卫战"?
  反倾销我企业打响保卫战
  据不完全统计,目前我国紧固件生产和贸易企业达近10000家,从业人员约250万人,2007年各类紧固件总产量约为525万吨,销售收入约为440亿元人民币,出口数量为257万吨,出口金额为32.5亿美元。
  由于产量世界第一,且半数出口,我国的紧固件产业历来就是国外贸易救济措施的重灾区。但长期以来,中方出口到欧盟的大多是中低端紧固件产品,而欧盟企业则主打高端。近年来,我国的紧固件产业主动谋求转型,从出口导向转向积极扩大内需和产业结构升级,而企业也在致力于提高产品的科技含量。据紧固件专业协会会长冯金尧表示,已有部分企业跻身于国内高端市场。
  但欧盟此时却高高挥起了两个大棒。一方面,在我国进口量激增的情况下,一些企业大幅降低产品价格,倾销高端产品,导致我国的紧固件企业迟迟不能实现从低端到高端的产业升级,只能在低端进行残酷的竞争。另一方面,欧盟再次发起了贸易救济调查,且滥用反倾销规则,对我征收高额反倾销税。
  2007年11月9日,应欧盟工业紧固件协会的申请,欧盟反倾销委员会立案对我国出口至欧盟的碳钢紧固件产品发起了反倾销调查。据了解,此次调查期为2006年10月1日至2007年9月30日,全国涉案企业1400余家,涉案金额达7.6亿美元,涉案数量60多万吨,占同期全国出口的25%左右。2008年12月3日,欧委会裁定,今后五年内对中国产碳钢紧固件征收加收63%~87%的反倾销税。
  2008年11月30日,中国机械通用零部件工业协会紧固件专业协会和47家紧固件企业代表中国紧固件产业,向商务部正式递交了反倾销申请书。"对欧进口紧固件发起反倾销调查,有助于我国紧固件企业获得更多的高端市场份额,实现产业升级。"张峰表示。
  保产业应诉欧委会滥用规则
  "欧委会给欧方在华投资企业优惠待遇,而对中国企业严重歧视,致使在终裁披露中,意大利和西班牙2家起诉方在中国的投资企业获得零税率,而其他中资企业则获得了高达87%的反倾销税。"张峰对本报记者表示,如果2009年2月9日欧盟开始征税,中国企业将完全退出欧盟市场。
  他告诉本报记者,"近段时间以来,中国紧固件工业协会与我会正积极与德国紧固件制造协会、欧盟紧固件工业协会协商。他们不认可欧委会的结论,认为反倾销税率太高,也不能接意大利和西班牙在中国的合资企业获得零税率的结果,他们现在正在考虑撤诉。但其可能性微乎其微。"
  一旦开始征税,欧盟紧固件市场将面临由中国企业退出而造成的每年60多万吨的缺口,"而获得零税率的两家企业,将可以利用这个机会扩大采购和生产规模,彻底控制中国对欧出口渠道和市场,危害我民族紧固件产业。"在提交给商务部产业损害调查局和中国机械工业联合会的文件中,嘉兴市紧固件进出口企业协会表示,鉴于此次欧委会在对我国碳钢紧固件产品的立案调查中,有许多做法明显违反WTO规则,"建议国家有关部门采取相应措施,以维持我国紧固件行业健康、安全发展,保护我国对欧正常出口。"
  首先,由于在2009年2月9日终裁前,欧盟成员国常驻欧盟代表和欧盟成员国贸易部长会议还将就该案进行讨论,希望商务部及我国的驻外机构能够游说欧盟各成员国,使他们反对对我国紧固件产品征税。
  其次,将欧委会滥用反倾销规则的做法上诉到WTO,进行多边磋商,在WTO框架内规范欧委会的调查行为。协会表示,除了在调查过程中采用双重标准为欧方在华企业牟利外,欧盟紧固件行业并没有受到中国进口产品的损害,不符合欧委会发起反倾销调查的要求。
  "本案起诉书中所列举的调查期内欧盟紧固件产业的12个经济指标中,仅有市场份额和赢利水平2个指标同比出现小幅下降,产能利用率这1个指标持平,其余如销售价格、雇工、投资等9个指标全部同比大幅增长。欧委会仅基于2个负面指标而忽略另外9个正面指标就对我国紧固件发起反倾销调查是不符合WTO规则的。"
  此外,协会认为,还"应制裁两家欧盟起诉方在华投资企业"。"他们既是原告又是被告,原因就是希望通过反倾销来打击在中国的竞争对手,以达到控制和占有中国对欧盟紧固件出口渠道的目的。"

Friday, 9 January 2009

Lecture in Seattle: Japan-China Trade Disputes: 'Aggressive Legalism' with a Confucian Touch

At the kind invitation of Prof. Saadia Pekkanen at the University of Washington, I will be speaking in Seattle next week on two occasions. Interested blog readers in the area are most welcome to join both events. Details are available below.

JANUARY 15, 2009

Thursday, 3:00-4:00 pm

Thomson Hall, Room 317

Henry Gao, Associate Professor, School of Law, Singapore Management University

Japan-China Trade Disputes:
'Aggressive Legalism' with a Confucian Touch

The first Chinese lawyer to ever work at the WTO Secretariat, Professsor Gao has published widely on all issues relating to China and WTO. He has spoken at conferences across the world and trained hundreds of government officials on WTO issues. A consultant to many national governments and international organizations, including the WTO, the World Bank and APEC, he is also a frequent commentator in major international media such as the Wall Street Journal, CNN, and Bloomberg.

Co-sponsored by the Japan Studies Program, China Studies Program, and East Asia Center.

Workshop in Seattle: International Law and Regulatory Change: New Models for Japan and China

JANUARY 16, 2009

Friday, 9:00a.m.-4:30 pm

William H. Gates Hall, Room 115

Saadia Pekkanen, Joseph Rawert, Veronica Taylor, Jane Winn, Dongsheng Zang, University of Washington
Ichiro Araki, Yokohama National University
Henry Gao, Associate Professor, School of Law, Singapore Management University
Amelia Porges, Sidley Austin LLP

International Law and Regulatory Change:
New Models for Japan and China

This public workshop brings together Japan and China specialists to assess the role of international law and regulatory change in shaping the continuing economic transformation of these two Asian countries. The workshop focuses on the following set of interrelated questions across four different papers: What specific steps have these two countries taken to configure the institutional, legal, and regulatory makeup of their economic realities? In which areas, and to what degree, is their influence evident? What are the main causes and major consequences of their actions for the advance of the legal and regulatory framework in the Asian region as a whole? The discussants for this workshop will include two leading international trade law specialists from China and Japan. As one of the goals of this workshop is to begin to focus on Asia as part of a global legal community, the workshop themes will also be discussed by a leading international economic law specialist who can place the developments in the larger context of legal processes.

Presented by the Asian Law Center, School of Law. 

External co-sponsor: The American Society of Law's International Economic Law Interest Group.

UW co-sponsors: Japan Studies Program, China Studies Program, and the Job and Gertrud Tamaki Professorship.




Wednesday, 7 January 2009

Lamy to lead the WTO for the next 4 years

It's been reported that Lamy is so far the only candidate for the WTO DG position and therefore will probably be automatically elected to serve a 2nd term as the WTO DG. How time has changed! Ten years ago, the heated DG-race between Supachai and Moore almost tore the organization apart. Also, when Lamy himself ran for the position in 2005, there was some strong competition from Foreign Minister Jaya Krishna Cuttaree of Mauritius. In my view, it's probably better to have Lamy serve another 4-year term in the interest of the consistency of the leadership in the WTO. 

Wednesday, 31 December 2008

China's new policy on Taiwan

There are several interesting points in the statement made by Chinese President Hu Jintao at an event commemorating the 30th anniversary of the publication of "Message to Compatriots in Taiwan" held in Beijing today:

1. The possibility of some sort of Economic Cooperation Agreement, or free-trade agreement, between China and Taiwan,
2. Taiwan could participate in international organizations "with reasonable arrangements made upon practical consultations between China and Taiwan". No wonder China softened its stance at the WTO earlier with regard to the GPA and candidacy of Taiwanese officials in WTO committees.
3. The two sides should end the state of hostility and reach peace agreements and "try to avoid war between brothers". This has not eliminated the possibility of taking Taiwan by force, but the position of China has been greatly softened from earlier stances.

告台胞书发表30周年 胡锦涛提出"六点"

(2008-12-31)

http://zaobao.com/special/newspapers/2008/12/others081231z.shtml

  来源:中评社

  纪念《告台湾同胞书》发表30周年座谈会31日上午在北京人民大会堂举行,中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席胡锦涛出席座谈会并发表重要讲话。中共中央政治局常委、全国人大常委会委员长吴邦国主持座谈会,中共中央政治局常委、全国政协主席贾庆林出席。

  胡锦涛发表讲话说,明天是2009年元旦,在这里我谨代表祖国大陆各族人民,向广大的台湾同胞致以诚挚的问候和衷心的祝福。1979年 元旦全国人民代表大会常委委员会发表《告台湾同胞书》,郑重宣誓了争取祖国和平统一的大政方针,两岸关系发展由此揭开了新的历史篇章。《告台湾同胞书》明 确提出,实现中国的统一,是人心所向,大势所趋,一定要考虑现实情况,完成祖国统一的大业,在解决统一问题时,尊重台湾现状和台湾各界人士的意见,采取合 情合理的政策和办法,不使台湾人民蒙受损失。《告台湾同胞书》明确提出,我们寄希望于台湾人民,也寄希望于台湾当局,《告台湾同胞书》明确倡议,通过商谈 结束台湾海峡军事对峙状态,撤除阻隔两岸同胞交往的藩篱,推动自由往来,实现通航、通邮、通商,开展经济文化交流,《告台湾同胞书》的发表标志着我们解决 台湾问题的理论和实践进入了一个新的历史时期。

  胡锦涛指出,自1949年台湾问题形成以来,我们始终把解决台湾问题,完成祖国统一大业作为自己的神圣职责,进行了长期不懈的努力。1978年党的十一届三中全会作出把党和国家工作中心转移到经济建设上来,实行改革开放的历史性决策,中国的发展从此进入历史新时期。

  胡锦涛说,《告台湾同胞书》就是在这样一个重要历史背景下发表的,30年来我们为促进台湾问题的解决提出了一系列对台方针政策。邓小平 同志根据国际国内形势发展变化,从中华民族根本利益和国家发展战略全局出发,在毛泽东同志、周恩来同志关于争取和平解决台湾问题思想的基础上创造性的提出 "一国两制 "伟大构想,为确立"和平统一、一国两制"的方针作出了历史性贡献。江泽民同志提出现阶段发展两岸关系,推进祖国和平统一进程的八项主张,丰富和发展了对 台方针政策,党的十六大以来,我们就对台工作做出重大决策部署,提出一系列新主张,新举措,赋予对台方针政策新的内涵,《反分裂国家法》的制定和实施,把 我们关于解决台湾问题的大政方针法律化,表达了我们坚持和平统一的一贯立场和最大诚意,同时表明了全中国人民坚决反对台独,捍卫国家主权和领土完整的共同 意志和坚定决心。《告台湾同胞书》发表以来,在两岸同胞和各界人士的共同努力下两岸关系发生重大变化,1987年底两岸同胞长期隔绝状态被打破,两岸同胞 交往日益密切,两岸经济合作蓬勃发展,形成互补、互利的格局,1992年两岸达成"九二共识",双方在此基础上举行首次"汪辜会谈",2005年国共两党 领导人实现历史性会谈,达成《两岸和平发展共同愿景》。

  胡锦涛指出,今年3月台湾局势发生积极变化,两岸关系迎来难得历史机遇,5月以来,本着建立互信、搁置争议、求同存异、共创双赢的精 神,两岸协商在"九二共识"的基础上得到恢复,并取得重要成果,两岸全面直击,双向三通迈出历史性步伐,双方妥善处理一系列问题,保持两岸关系改善和发展 势头,推动两岸关系展现出和平发展的前景。今天两岸同胞往来之频繁,经济联系之密切,文化交流之活跃,共同利益之广泛是前所未有的,中国人民维护台海和 平,推动两岸关系发展,实现祖国和平统一的事业,日益赢得国际社会理解和支持,世界各国普遍承认一个中国的格局不断巩固和发展。

  胡锦涛说,30年来两岸关系发展的实践告诉我们,推动两岸关系发展,实现祖国和平统一最重要的是要遵循"和平统一、一国两制的方针" 和现阶段发展两岸关系推进祖国和平统一进程的八项主张,坚持"一个中国"的原则绝不动摇,争取和平统一的努力绝不放弃,贯彻寄希望于希望台湾人民的方针绝 不改变,反对台独分裂活动绝不妥协,牢牢把握两岸关系和平、发展的主题,真诚为两岸同胞谋福祉,为台海地区谋和平,维护国家主权和领土完整,维护中华民族 根本利益,30年的实践充分证明我们制定和实施的对台工作大政方针顺应了时代潮流和历史的趋势,把握了民族根本利益和国家核心利益,体现了尊重历史、尊重 现实、尊重人民愿望的实事求是精神,反应了对两岸关系发展规律的深刻认识,从而推动两岸关系发展取得了历史性成就。

  胡锦涛强调,我们要继续长期坚持和全面贯彻这些被实践证明是正确的大政方针,继续推动祖国和平统一进程不断向前迈进,30年的实践充 分证明,祖国大陆改革开放和现代化建设不断取得巨大进步,是推动两岸关系发展,实现祖国和平统一的雄厚基础和可靠保障,决定了两岸关系的基本格局和发展方 向。30年的实践充分证明,海峡两岸中国人有能力、有智慧把两岸关系的前途掌握在自己手中,通过交流合作增进感情融合,增加共同利益,通过协商谈判,积累 共识,减少分歧、循序渐进解决问题,30年的实践还充分证明台独分裂势力及其分裂活动违背两岸同胞共同利益,损害中华民族根本利益,中国不可阻挡的历史潮 流,是对两岸关系和平发展的最大威胁,必然遭到两岸同胞共同反对,任何人,任何势力把台湾从中国分割出去的企图都是注定要失败的。

  胡锦涛说,经过30年的改革开放中国的面貌发生了历史性变化,中国同世界的关系发生了历史性变化,两岸关系历经风雨坎坷,也站在了新 的历史起点上,回顾近代民族之艰难奋斗历程,展望未来民族之光明发展前景,我们应该登高望远,审时度势,本着对历史、对人民负责的态度,站在全民族发展的 高度,以更远大的目光,更丰富的智慧,更坚毅的勇气,更务实的思路,认真思考和务实解决两岸关系发展的重大问题。解决台湾问题的核心是实现祖国统一,目的 是维护和确保国家主权和领土完整,追求包括台湾同胞在内的全体中华儿女的幸福,实现中华民族伟大复兴,以和平方式实现祖国统一最符合包括台湾同胞在内的中 华民族根本利益,也符合求和平、谋发展、促合作的时代潮流,我们一定要以最大诚意尽最大努力,争取祖国和平统一。

  胡锦涛指出,首先要确保两岸关系和平发展,这有利于两岸同胞加强交流合作,融洽感情,有利于两岸积累互信,解决争议,有利于两岸经济 共同发展,共同繁荣。有利于维护国家主权和领土完整,实现中华民族伟大复兴。为此我们要牢牢把握两岸关系和平发展的主题,积极推动两岸关系和平发展,实现 全民族的团结、和谐、昌盛,我们应该把坚持大陆和台湾同属一个中国,作为推动两岸关系和平发展的政治基础,把深化交流合作,推进协商谈判作为推动两岸关系 和平发展的重要途径,把促进两岸同胞团结奋斗,作为推动两岸关系和平发展的强大动力,携手共进,戮力同心,努力开创两岸关系和平发展新局面,以恪守"一个 中国",增进政治互信,维护国家主权和领土完整是国家核心利益,世界上只有一个中国,中国主权和领土完整不容分割,1949年以来大陆和台湾尽管尚未统 一,但不是中国领土和主权的分裂,而是上个世纪40年代中后期中国内战遗留并延续的政治对立,这没有改变大陆和台湾同属一个中国的事实,两岸终归统一,不 是主权和领土再造,而是结束政治对立,两岸在事关维护一个中国框架这一原则问题上形成共同认知和一致立场,就有了各族政治互信的基础,什么事情都好商量, 两岸应该本着建设性态度积极面向未来,共同努力创造条件,通过平等协商逐步解决两岸关系中历史遗留的问题和发展过程中产生的新问题。

  继续反对台独分裂活动是推动两岸关系和平发展的必要条件,是两岸同胞的共同责任,凡是有利于两岸关系和平发展的事,都应该大力推动,凡是破坏两岸关系和平发展的事都必须坚决反对。

  第二,推进经济合作,促进共同发展。两岸同胞要开展经济大合作,扩大两岸直接三通,后置共同利益,形成紧密联系,实现互利双赢,我们继 续欢迎并支持台湾企业到大陆经营发展,鼓励和支持有条件的大陆企业到台湾投资兴业,我们期待实现两岸经济关系正常化,推动经济合作制度化,为两岸关系和平 发展奠定更为扎实的物质基础,提供更为强大的经济动力,两岸可以维持签订综合性经济合作协议,建立具有两岸特色的经济合作机制,以最大限度实现优势互补, 互惠互利,建立更加紧密的两岸经济合作机制进程,有利于台湾经济提升竞争力和扩大发展空间,有利于两岸经济共同发展,有利于探讨两岸经济共同发展同亚太区 域经济合作机制相衔接的可行途径。

  第三,弘扬中华文化,加强精神纽带。中华文化源远流长,瑰丽灿烂,是两岸同胞共同的宝贵财富,是维系两岸同胞民族感情的重要纽带,中 华文化在台湾根深衣茂,台湾文化丰富了中华文化的内涵,台湾同胞爱乡爱土的台湾意识不等于台独意识,两岸同胞要共同继承和弘扬中华文化优秀传统,开展各种 形式的合作交流,使中华文化星火相传,发扬光大,以增强民族意识,凝聚共同意志,形成共谋中华民族伟大复兴的精神力量。尤其要加强两岸青少年交流,不断为 两岸关系和平发展增添蓬勃活力,我们将继续采取积极措施,包括愿意协商两岸文化教育交流协议,推动两岸文化教育交流合作,迈上范围更广、层次更高的新台 阶。

  第四,加强人员往来扩大各界交流,两岸同胞要扩大交流,两岸各界及其代表性人士要扩大交流,加强善意沟通,增进相互了解,对于任何有 利于推动两岸关系和平发展的建设性意见我们都愿意作出积极回应,我们将继续推动国共两岸交流对话,共同落实两岸和平发展共同愿景,对于部分台湾同胞由于各 种原因对祖国大陆缺乏了解,甚至存在误解,对发展两岸关系持有疑虑,我们不仅愿意以最大的包容和耐心加以化解和疏导,而且愿意采取更加积极的措施让越来越 多的台湾同胞在推动两岸关系和平发展中增进福祉。

  胡锦涛特别指出,对于那些曾经主张过、从事过,追随过台独的人我们也热忱欢迎他们回到推动两岸关系和平发展的正确方向上来,我们希望民进党认清时势停止台独分裂活动,不要在与全民族的共同意愿背道而驰,只要民进党改变台独分裂立场,我们愿意作出正面回应。

  第五,维护国家主权协商涉外事务,我们一贯致力于维护台湾同胞在国外的正当权益,我们驻外使领馆要加强台湾同胞的协议,我们了解台湾同 胞对参与国际活动问题的感受,重视解决与之相关的问题,两岸在涉外事务中避免不必要的内讧有利于增进中华民族整体利益,对于台湾同外国开展民间性经济文化 往来的前景可以进一步协商,对于台湾参与国际组织活动问题,在不造成"两个中国","一中一台"的前提下可以通过两岸的务实协商作出合情合理的安排,解决 台湾问题,实现国家完全统一是中国内部事务,不受任何外国势力干涉。

  第六,结束敌对状态,达成和平协议,海峡两岸中国人有责任共同终极两岸敌对的历史,极力避免再出现骨肉同胞兵戎相见,让子孙后代在和平环境中携手创造美好生活。

  胡锦涛说,为有利于两岸协商谈判,对彼此往来作出安排,两岸可以就在国家尚未统一的特殊情况下的政治关系展开务实探讨,为有利于稳定台 海局势,减轻军事安全顾虑,两岸可以就军事问题进行接触、交流,探讨建立军事安全互信机制问题。我们再一次呼吁在"一个中国"原则的基础上,协商正式结束 两岸敌对状态达成和平协议,构建两岸关系和平发展框架。两岸同胞是血脉相连的命运共同体,包括大陆和台湾在内的中国是两岸同胞的共同家园,两岸同胞有责任 把它维护好建设好,实现中华民族伟大复兴要靠两岸同胞共同奋斗,两岸关系和平发展新局面,要靠两岸同胞共同开创,两岸关系和平发展成果由两岸同胞共同享 有,我们要坚持以人为本,把寄希望于台湾人民方针贯彻到各项对台工作中去,理解、信赖、关心台湾同胞,体察他们的意愿,了解他们的诉求,为他们排忧解难, 满腔热情,为台湾同胞多办好事和多办实事,依法保护台湾同胞正当权益,最广泛的团结台湾同胞一道推动两岸关系和平发展,台湾的前途系于两岸关系和平发展, 系于中华民族伟大复兴,在推动两岸关系和平发展,实现中华民族伟大复兴的道路上台湾同胞将同大陆同胞一道共享一个伟大国家的尊严和荣耀,以做堂堂正正的中 国人骄傲和自豪。

  胡锦涛也提到,长期以来广大香港同胞、澳门同胞和海外侨胞心系祖国统一大业,是反独促统的重要力量,我们衷心的希望香港同胞、台湾同 胞、海外侨胞为推动两岸关系和平发展,实现和祖国平统一作出新的贡献。多年来国际社会对中国政府和中国人民维护台海和平,推动两岸关系发展,实现国家完全 统一的事业给予了积极支持,中国政府对此表示赞赏和感谢。中国的统一不会损害任何国家的利益,只会促进亚太地区和世界繁荣稳定,只会有利于中国人民为人类 和平与发展的崇高事业作出新的更大的贡献。

  胡锦涛最后指出,两岸统一是中华民族走向伟大复兴的历史必然,尽管前进道路上还会出现困难和阻碍,但只要我们坚定信心,不懈努力,紧紧依靠两岸同胞就一定能够开创两岸关系和平发展新局面,迎来中华民族伟大复兴的锦绣前程。

  座谈会上,全国人大常委会副委员长兼秘书长李建国,全国政协副主席、台湾民主自治同盟中央主席林文漪,中华全国学生联合会主席刘凯,中共中央台湾工作办公室、国务院台湾事务办公室主任王毅先后发言。

  中央党政军群有关部门和北京市负责同志,各民主党派中央、全国工商联负责人以及各界代表等出席了座谈会。

Tuesday, 23 December 2008

China's reaction to the subsidy case

Commenting on the recent case brought by the US against China on famous brands subsidies, Mr. Xiankun LU, Counsellor in the WTO mission of China, stated, "Such complaints are very normal between WTO members. We'd bring a complaint too if we were facing similar problems. Thus, it's hard to say whether this would have any impact on US-China trade. It would not have any impact on any other subsidies measures either." (emphasis added)

Indeed, China requested for the panel in another case against US CVD practices the same day.

按WTO规则处理美出口补贴起诉

http://www.sina.com.cn  2008年12月23日 02:57  每日经济新闻
◆每经记者 江旋 发自北京

    昨日,商务部条法司负责人就美国和墨西哥要求终止中国对知名品牌的补贴措施表示,中方一贯尊重世贸组织规则,反对贸易保护主义,对美墨的磋商请求,中方将按照世贸组织规则予以处理。

    中国驻WTO代表团参赞卢先�表示,从19日开始的10之内中方会向美墨答复,确定磋商时间。按照世贸组织争端解决程序,磋商期一般为60天。

    "这类申诉在WTO成员之间是很正常,我们如果遇到这样的问题也会提起申诉。所以,很难说会对中美贸易产生什么影响,"卢先�说,"对其他的补贴措施也不会产生影响。

The Great Subsidy War is Coming?

On Dec 22nd, China requested the establishment of the panel in the case against US AD & CVD duties on certain products (steel pipe, tires, etc.). This is the third case China has brought against the US and the 2nd case China brought against US CVD practices. There are several interesting issues in this case:

1. The request for the panel was made only a few days after the US brought a case against Chinese export subsidies. As the US itself has been providing various loans lately to private firms, one wonders whether this would set off the trigger for a global war on subsidies (and/or CVDs) ? To be more specific, one wonders whether China would bring a case against US subsidies (rather than CVD practices) any time soon?

2. In its panel request, Chin also alleged that the US breached Art. 15(b) of the Accession Protocol of China, which sanctions the application of the "alternative benchmark" approach in CVD investigations against China. According to China, the US breached this provision by failing to make a finding of "special difficulties" before resorting to the "alternative benchmark" approach. The interesting legal question here is: does the Accession Protocol create legal obligations for China only, or does it create legal obligations for other WTO members as well?

Saturday, 20 December 2008

New wine in old bottle

At the TNC meeting on 17 December, the last one in 2008, DG Lamy raised some interesting points in his speech. Some of the key issues are highlighted below, which my comments in brackets.

On the wider WTO front, I would like to put forward three elements for your consideration, which also stem from our discussions since Friday:

First, I believe that the WTO has a particular responsibility to follow up on the trade measures which been taken in the wake of the financial crisis; you all know that I have set up an internal Task Force to produce regular updates of these measures so that we have a better sense of the trade consequences of the financial crisis.

(HG: These measures include export restrictions on agricultural products, rescue packages that could be challenged as illegal subsidies, etc. Some of these are discussed in an article by Aaditya Mattoo and Arvind Subramanian in the next issue of the Foreign Affairs)

I am ready to report to you periodically on developments on that front in writing, as suggested by Egypt on behalf of the Arab Group and by Japan, also with the support of a number of other Members. My first report could come already this week.

I also believe it would be useful to provide a forum where this WTO radar picture could be discussed collectively; I do not think we need to reinvent the wheel so we could use one of the existing forums in the house to this effect: the Trade Policy Review Body. I have discussed this with the Chair of the TPRB, Ambassador Agah of Nigeria, and he is agreeable to this. We will be looking into a date during the second part of January when a first review among Members could be held on the basis of this radar picture.

(HG: There has been some talks to create a so-called "Bretton Woods II". I don't think that is necessary. While the Bretton Woods institutions surely have their shares in creating the mess we are in today, the main reason for the trouble is not because the existing rules or institutions are insufficient. Instead, it was exactly because the institutions did not do what they are supposed to do and we did not follow the rules that we are in the trouble today.)

Second, I believe we need to keep reviewing developments in the area of trade finance where the WTO early interventions have been useful in mobilising resources for this important area; trade finance is an area which seriously impacts trade flows for developing countries and we should remain vigilant and active.

Third, I believe we need to have a clear roadmap for work on Aid for Trade in 2009, culminating with the second Global Review before the summer break. We need to keep the focus on mainstreaming trade into Members' development policies and we also need to keep pressure on the mobilization of funds, which has been reasonably successful but where more could be done, in particular in view of the current financial crisis.

Looking into 2009, some of you have mentioned your desire to brainstorm over issues which are beyond the scope of the negotiations but which relate to areas interfacing the WTO. I agree with this. The only point I would make is that this may be a useful exercise, provided it does not distract us from our main objective of advancing the Round. I suggest we come back to this in the General Council sometime at the beginning of 2009.

(HG: Does this mean the resurrection of the debate on competition, labour and environment? Some of these have been explicitly rejected by the membership before. Is this the right time to revive talks on these issues? I'm not so confident)

A final point: in the New Year we will also have to discuss the next WTO Ministerial Conference, by which I mean our regular mandated Ministerial Conference; my own sense is that this need not be the big jamboree we have seen in the past, but rather a venue where Members take a strategic look at the future and steps to advance the goals of the organisation. On this issue, the General Council Chairman will consult with Members to get their views and take this forward.

(HG: Good for the WTO: ever since the HK Ministerial 3 years ago, the WTO has not had a ministerial conference. This is a breach of Art IV.1 in the, but the question is who has the standing to sue the WTO on this.

As I've said before, one problem with WTO MCs is that there is too much media attention, and nobody can really work well under spotlight. It's good to know that the DG also prefers low-profile MCs over the noisy carnivals in the past. )

In sum, while the year may end in disappointment, we should now gather ourselves and work in 2009 to demonstrate that the WTO remains as necessary and credible as ever. The world trading system needs the Doha Round to better respond to the needs and aspirations of its Members. Concluding the Round should remain our focus in 2009. But this endeavour takes place within a more global portfolio of WTO activities in which we need to keep investing. This task starts today.

From textiles to peanuts

On Friday, the USTR filed another WTO case against China concerning China's "Famous Brands" programs. According to the Consultation Request, the Chinese programs allegedly violate the SCM Agreement, the Ag Agreement, and the NT obligation under GATT Art. III.

In the press release, USTR Susan Schwab announced that the reason to take this case was because "
we were disturbed to find that China still appears to be using WTO-illegal measures to promote its exports, ranging from textiles and refrigerators to beer and peanuts. We are going to the WTO today because we are determined to use all resources available to fight industrial policies that aim to unfairly promote Chinese branded products at the expense of American workers, farmers, ranchers, manufacturers and intellectual property owners". Of course this case is not about peanuts, even though China happens to be the largest exporter on this. The more likely cause is textiles, as US textile firms try to find other ways to fight the onslaught of Chinese exports ahead of the expiration of the Special Textile Safeguard at the end of this year.

Interestingly, Sanlu is also on the 2005 list of "famous brands" in China. Moreover, the website of the China Promotion Committee for Top Brand Strategy even provides detailed instructions on how to distinguish some "famous brands" Chinese dairy products, including milk powder made by Sanlu, from the fake ones. Now it seems the best way might be testing the melamine levels of the products concerned.

Friday, 19 December 2008

Taking down the pirates

The UN Security Council recently approved a resolution allowing foreign military forces to go after pirates on land in Somalia. In case anyone was thinking this is something new, the FDA has already opened an office in Beijing a month ago. While the stated goal of the new office, the first foreign office of the FDA, is to ensure food safety and protect consumers, the responsibilities of the office also include detecting counterfeit/pirated drugs. It seems that piracy is not that far away from you and me, and China is not that remote from Somalia after all.

Wednesday, 17 December 2008

The scapegoating game continues

In an interesting recent article, Paul Blustein, Journalist in Residence at The Brookings Institution provides a behind-the-scenes account on what really happened during the ill-fated WTO Ministerial this July. It seems that it was not really fair to blame it on China. Instead, China's biggest neighbour (in terms of population) and the US seems to be the one who were responsible.

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

Merry Christmas to China - from Geneva

The AB report for the Auto Parts case has just been released to the
public. Not surprisingly, the AB affirmed the Panel on almost all
accounts. However, by refusing to affirm the panel on the Art. II.1
claims, the AB has left a huge loophole in the future implementation
of the AB ruling. It is interesting to see whether China will try to
exploit this loophole when the time comes for enforcement.